Case filedSeptember 11, 2026
Latest verified entryFiling 6
Defendant responseNot shown on reviewed mirror
Merits decisionNone verified
Source limitation: The free Justia docket page says its report was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. It displays entries 1–6. A newer filing could appear first on PACER or another official court source. This tracker never treats the absence of an entry on a delayed mirror as proof that no newer entry exists.
Current case file
Full caption:Gordon p/k/a Shabba Ranks v. Greensleeves Publishing Ltd.
Case number: 1:26-cv-07933
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Nature of suit: Copyright
Cause shown on docket: 28 U.S.C. § 2201, declaratory judgment (copyright)
Jury demand: None shown
Rexton Gordon, known professionally as Shabba Ranks, asks for a declaration concerning termination notices covering U.S. interests in listed musical compositions. The reported dispute centers on whether the compositions were valid works made for hire. This tracker records procedure. The companion legal explainer examines the underlying concepts.
CompletedAwaiting verified filingPossible later stage
| Date | Docket / stage | Status | Plain-language meaning | What to watch |
|---|
| 2023 | Termination notice reportedly served | Pre-suit event | Reporting says Gordon notified Greensleeves that he intended to terminate the earlier grant. Exact dates and covered interests should be checked against the filed exhibit. | Notice, service proof, effective dates, recording data and composition schedule. |
| Nov. 11, 2025 | Correspondence attached to complaint | Exhibit listed | The docket identifies a November 11 letter as Complaint Exhibit 4. The public docket summary does not reproduce its full contents. | The parties’ precise positions and any admissions or preserved objections. |
| Jan. 14, 2026 | Correspondence attached to complaint | Exhibit listed | The docket identifies a January 14 letter as Complaint Exhibit 5. | Whether the letter narrows the works, territory or legal dispute. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | Complaint filed — Entry 1 | Completed | Gordon formally opened the federal case. Attachments include a composition list, termination notice, assignment and two letters. A complaint states claims; it is not a judgment. | Full prayer for relief, asserted statutory basis, song schedule and termination dates. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | Civil cover sheet — Entry 2 | Completed | An administrative case-opening document categorizes the dispute. It does not decide substance. | Court assignment and case-management directions. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | Rule 7.1 disclosure — Entry 3 | Completed | The plaintiff filed a corporate disclosure statement indicating no corporate parent. | Any required disclosure filed by the defendant after appearance. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | AO 121 copyright form — Entry 4 | Completed | The standard copyright case-opening notice was submitted for court review. | No merits inference should be drawn from this form. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | Summons requested — Entry 5 | Completed | Gordon requested issuance of a summons to Greensleeves. A request is not proof of completed service. | Issued summons, proof or waiver of service, and response deadline. |
| Sept. 11, 2026 | Counsel appearance — Entry 6 | Completed | Attorney James C. Ng entered an appearance for Gordon. | Additional appearances and counsel for Greensleeves. |
| Not verified | Service on Greensleeves | Awaiting filing | The reviewed mirror does not show proof that service was completed or waived. | Summons returned executed, waiver, stipulation or court order. |
| Not verified | Defendant response | Awaiting filing | No answer or motion by Greensleeves appears in the reviewed mirror. | Answer, motion to dismiss, extension request or jurisdictional objection. |
| Not scheduled | Initial conference | Possible stage | The assigned judge may set a conference and case schedule after service and appearance. | Scheduling order, discovery plan and proposed case-management dates. |
| Not started publicly | Discovery | Possible stage | The parties may exchange agreements, creation records, correspondence, registrations and accounting evidence. | Protective orders, discovery disputes, expert reports and stipulations. |
| No ruling | Merits resolution | Undecided | The dispute could end through dismissal, judgment, trial, settlement or another negotiated resolution. | Signed order, opinion, judgment, notice of settlement or dismissal. |
What the opening filings mean
Entry 1The complaint begins the case; it does not prove the claim
The complaint is Gordon’s statement of the legal controversy and the relief he wants. It reportedly argues that the compositions cannot be excluded from termination merely because an agreement called them works made for hire. The court must still acquire jurisdiction over the served defendant, receive the defense and decide any disputed issues.
Entries 2–4Administrative filings organize the case
The cover sheet, disclosure statement and copyright notice help the clerk classify the action and identify interests. They should not be reported as endorsements of the complaint. Their importance is procedural transparency, not proof.
Entries 5–6A summons request and counsel appearance move the case toward an adversarial stage
A requested summons is one step toward formal notice. The next decisive document will be proof or waiver of service because response deadlines generally run from service-related events. Counsel’s appearance shows representation for Gordon; it does not establish that Greensleeves has appeared.
The procedural path ahead
Complaint and service
Answer or motion
Case schedule and discovery
Judgment, trial or settlement
Appeal, if any
This flow is a guide, not a prediction. A motion could narrow or end the case before discovery. The parties could settle before a judicial interpretation of the work-made-for-hire question. A court could decide a threshold issue while leaving song-specific questions unresolved. Any appeal would come only after an appealable ruling.
Questions the tracker will answer
- When and how was Greensleeves served, and when is its response due?
- Does the defendant contest jurisdiction, timing, notice compliance, authorship, scope or work-made-for-hire status?
- Which compositions and which U.S. rights are included in the termination schedule?
- What effective termination dates are claimed for each grant?
- Does the court treat the catalogue as one dispute or require song-by-song analysis?
- Will the matter produce a published opinion, a private settlement or another disposition?
- Does any order address composition rights only, or does a later filing actually place master rights in dispute?
Tracker update standard
Primary-source first. A new row will be added when an official docket or reliable public mirror shows a filing, or when a party makes a document available and its relationship to the case can be verified.
Two dates. Every update should show the event date and the verification date. This prevents a mirror’s crawl date from being mistaken for the filing date.
Procedural precision. “Filed,” “alleged,” “argued,” “reported,” “ordered,” “dismissed” and “settled” are not interchangeable.
Corrections. Substantive corrections should be recorded with the original wording, corrected wording, reason and date rather than silently rewritten.
Sources
Legal-information notice: This tracker summarizes public records and general copyright concepts. It is not legal advice. A docket entry records an event; it does not establish the truth of disputed allegations.